Соотнесите английские слова и словосочетания с их русскими эквивалентами

1) indictable offence	a) рассматривать (дело, случай)
2) summary offence	b) Суд Kороны
3) either — way offence	c) насилие, принуждение, применение
	силы
4) to try	d) преступление, подлежащее преследо-
	ванию по обвинительному акту
5) the Сrown Court	e) суд, судебное разбирательство
6) magistrates’ court	f) преступное намерение
7) violence	g) виновное действие
8) trial	h) ответственность
9) mens rea	i) преступление двойной подсудности
10) actus reus	j) магистратский суд

11) intent	k) преступление, преследуемое в порядке
	суммарного производства
12) liability	l) намерение, умысел

Подберите с помощью словаря названия правонарушителей, ис-пользуя глаголы и словосочетания, приведенные в таблице.

1) steals

2) steals purses and wallets

3) gets money by threatening to disclose personal information

4) seizes aeroplanes

5) takes things from a shop without paying

6) kills people

7) steals from houses and offices especially at night

8) takes people hostages for ransom

9) tries to get secret information

10) marries illegally while being married already

11) steals from banks and trains

В таблице приведены различные виды преступлений. С помощью словаря дополните таблицу.

Сrime	Criminal	Verb
assassination	an assassin	to assassinate
burglary
smuggling
hi-jacking
embezzlement
murder
mugging
robbery

Заполните таблицу словами, связанными со словом theft (1—8). Составьте предложения с этими словами.

1. The past participle of the verb to steal.

2. A person who enters a house to steal things.

3. To steal something from persons on the street without their noticing.

4. To stop a person on the street and using violence or threats to rob him or her.

5. Going into a building by force to steal things (one word).

6. A person who steals from a shop.

7. A psychological compulsion to steal things.

8. A person who commits an act of theft.

UNIT 3. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

TEXT

Criminal Procedure

Vocabulary

1. reasonable grounds — достаточные основания

2. preponderance of evidence — наличие более веских доказательств

3. to plead innocent — заявить о своей невиновности

4. to take an oath — принять присягу

5. to overturn a court decision — отменить решение суда

Прочитайте и переведите текст. Ответьте на вопросы.

1. How many stages does a criminal case pass?

2. Why is an arrest warrant necessary?

3. What do criminal charges depend on?

4. Can a case be resolved without a trial?

5. How does counsel for the prosecution manage to produce evidence in court?

6. What kind of evidence can be excluded?

7. What is the purpose of appeals?

PRE-TRIAL STAGE. A criminal case passes through several phases before trial. At the first stage the crime is reported and investigated. Then, if there is “probable cause”, i.e. reasonable grounds (something more than mere suspicion to believe that a particular person committed the crime) the person can be arrested. An arrest warrant is necessary unless the pressure of time requires immediate action (e.g. before the suspect flees).

Finally, criminal charges must be lodged against the defendant. Depending on the state, the charges are called either an indictment (by a grand jury) or information (by a magistrate or police officer). They must be based on probable cause, preponderance of evidence, or prosecutor’s evidence that supports a belief in the defendant’s guilt.

In the USA most cases are resolved without a trial. Attorneys for the defence and prosecution usually reach a plea bargain. The judge must decide whether the guilty plea was freely given and whether there was some factual basis for the plea, but judicial disapproval of an agreed upon plea is rare.

BURDEN OF PROOF. At the trial there is crucial difference between criminal and civil cases in the level of proof required. A civil plaintiff merely needs a preponderance of the evidence; the judge only needs to find that the evidence favours the plaintiff over the defendant. A successful criminal prosecution requires proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Counsel for the prosecution opens the case with a short description of the events of the crime and calls his witnesses. After taking an oath by the witness counsel for the prosecution begins his examination by asking the witness their name, profession, place of domicile. In English law, witnesses are not allowed to make lengthy statements to the court. It is the duty of the attorneys for both parties to examine and cross-examine witnesses.

THE ORDER OF PROCEEDINGS. The session is opened by the court called to order by the Clerk of the Court. The judge enters. The clerk says: “All rise”. Everyone stands up and waits for the judge to take his seat. The accused is brought into the dock and the clerk asks for his or her name. The accused answers with the appropriate plea.

In English law a person is innocent until proven guilty. This means that in a trial the burden of proof is on the prosecution and if the prosecution cannot establish a reasonable cause for conviction the court must acquit the accused.

Both the defence and prosecution give their closing arguments, the prosecution going first. The judge sums up the evidence and instructs the jury on their duties. He reminds the jury that if there is any doubt at all in

their minds they must acquit the defendant. The jury retires to the jury room to consider the verdict. The verdict “not guilty” does not necessarily mean that the judge or jury believe the defendant to be innocent. It is simply a finding that there was insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

EVIDENCE. Criminal trial courts have numerous, complex rules about what evidence is admissible, and how it may be introduced. The rules are supposed to exclude irrelevant, unreliable, or unfairly prejudicial matters, especially in jury cases (the system presupposes that a judge is less likely to be swayed by improper evidence). The jury’s verdict is to be based solely on the evidence properly brought out at the trial. Otherwise proper, highly relevant evidence may be excluded because it was obtained in violation of a defendant’s constitutional rights. Criminal appeals are often decided on such so-called technical issues.

APPEALS. The appeal is a petition for review of a case that has been decided by a court of law. The petition made to a higher court for the purpose of overturning the lower court’s decision. The specific procedures for appealing can vary greatly depending on the type of case and jurisdiction where the case was prosecuted. The appeal system is mostly for the benefit of the defendant, but it is possible for the prosecution to appeal for a retrial.

Appellate courts cannot overturn a verdict simply because they disagree with it — e.g., with how the jury weighed the evidence and decided to believe one witness more than another witness. Appeals tend to focus on problems in the trial, judge’s legal ruling, the instructions to the jury, and the trial procedures, not simply in the judge’s factual interpretations.