Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.

Over recent years, more and more people have been attending university and arguments have persisted as to whether students should pay for this privilege not. Although there are convincing arguments on both sides, I strongly believe that it should be free.

One argument put forward in favour of charging students is that education is becoming more expensive to fund as universities grow in size. Consequently, making students pay may maintain standards and ensure the quality of the teaching. In addition, it is argued that most students benefit from university in terms of higher paid jobs, so it is fair that they pay for at least some of the cost, especially given that the majority of students attending university are from the middle classes. Last but not least, in many countries, there is a shortage of people to do manual jobs such as plumbing and carpentry, so making university more expensive may encourage people to take up these jobs.

However, there are a number of arguments in favour of making university education free for all. Firstly, it will encourage more people to attend and this will benefit society. This is because it will lead to a more productive and educated workforce. Research has generally shown that those countries that have a better educated population via university have higher levels of innovation and productivity. In addition, there is the issue of equality of opportunity. If all students are required to pay, those on a low income may be dissuaded from attending, thus making it unfair. The reason for this is that they will likely not be able to secure financial support from their family so they will be concerned about the debts they will incur in the future.

In conclusion, I am of opinion that all education should remain equally available to all regardless of income. This is not only fair, but will also ensure that countries can prosper and develop into the future with a well-educated workforce.

326 Words

All education (primary, secondary and further education) should be free to all people and paid and managed by the government. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer.

Model Answer 1:

Education is an important part of everyone's life and it plays a very important role in the growth of an individual. Making education free for everyone and managing all by the government will be a very big step towards the rapid growth of a society. All parents want to make their children educated by sending them to school, colleges but sometimes due to the lack of resources, they have to deprive their children even from the basic education. By making education free of all will ensure that nobody will miss education just because they can’t afford to pay.

A government's step of making the education free will set an example in our society. It will show that if you have a strong will and determination to study and prosper, not having any money or resource will not stop you from making a paradigm shift.

Education with no fees will identify all those talents which can be at top given education and guidance but get lost because their parents can’t afford to pay for schools. Everyone will stand equal chance to succeed. It will increase the literacy rate of that country and will improve the growth of that country as well. It was seen in the past that countries having higher literacy rates have been more successful. By making education free, a majority of people will be educated, making overall a positive environment in our society. There will be fewer crimes in society. Educating people will be making them more responsible.

Governments should put more emphasis on education by making it free. Just like food and shelter education should also be a basic right and free for everyone.

[ by - Ridhima ]

Model Answer 2:

The opinion that every citizen should have the right to study at school or university for free is very controversial one. Those, who disagree, refer to enormous expenditures of government in case of establishing such laws. Although, I hold the viewpoint that not charging people for education could become very beneficial for a country and its economy.

First, young people from poor families could be very smart. Looking back to history and biographies of distinguished people, raised in poverty can illustrate this best. Making schooling available only for fortunate is not fair. Moreover, the state well-being could also be affected, because there would be a lack of talented specialists, whose skills was not discovered and developed by proper training.

Another advantage of making education free of charge is the happiness of the nation. An individual's inability to collect the amount of money he needs to pay school or university fee cause stress and anxiety in the middle-class society, which can even keep them from having children. Nowadays we can see that the lowest birthrate is in countries where prices of enrollment to highest education institutions are very high. This clearly indicates the fact that citizens of rich countries do not feel able to provide their future offspring proper education.

Finally, nothing seems to be more beneficial to a country's economy than an educated and intelligent nation. Free courses and study programs can prepare excellent specialists, who would work to bring profit themselves and hence their country. That would surely compensate most expenses of state budget caused by education of no charge.

To sum up, even though making all schools free can be very expensive for a state's economy, advantages are invaluable. After several years such improvements would bring fruits of happy, intelligent nation confident about its future.

4)

Тема эссе Writing Task 2 (была на официальных экзаменах IELTS в марте 2017 года):

Many people believe that more money should be allocated to teaching science than any other subject in order for a country to progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and examples.

План эссе:

Introduction– перефразируем тему и покажем структуру эссе

Essay body 1 – Аргументы в защиту научных дисциплин:
Topic sentence: Teaching science is considered a top priority for some people
Examples:
(1) научный прогресс напрямую влияет на развитие страны, поэтому акцент на науках крайне важен в системе образования.
(2) научные дисциплины очень востребованы среди учеников и студентов, потому что, как показывает практика, специалисты в этой сфере имеют высокие доходы и широкие возможности трудоустройства во всем мире.

Essay body 2 – Аргументы в защиту других дисциплин:
Topic sentence: Teaching other academic subjects should not be neglected
Examples:
(1) «другие» дисциплины (логично, что имеются в виду гуманитарные) также важны, потому что развитие и сохранение культуры и истории является необходимым для другой нации, и финансирование преподавания таких предметов также должно быть в достаточном объеме.
(2) «другие» дисциплины развивают образное мышление, способность рассуждать, развивают художественные таланты. не все ученики и студенты находят себя в науке, а избирают профессии в гуманитарной сфере — хотят стать художниками, писателями или музыкантами.

Conclusion– я бы согласился с тем, что нужно финансировать преподавание научных дисциплин в большем объеме, т.к. мы живем в эру динамичного технического прогресса, но и другие дисциплины не стоит забывать, потому что они также важны для ненаучных сфер жизни.

Готовое эссе:

The idea of funding allocation for education is considered among top priorities in education systems nowadays. There is an opinion that teaching sciences should receive more funding than teaching other academic disciplines in order to ensure the sustainable development of the country. In this essay, I will attempt to elaborate on both sides of this issue and outline my opinion.

To start with, it is common practice in many countries to support teaching science due to several important reasons. Among them is the fact that education is seen as a stepping stone for continuous technological progress in the country and, thus, training future technical professionals becomes the major task for any education system. Another notable factor is that scientific knowledge is generally in high demand with young people as it is viewed a precursor of wide employment opportunities and substantial salaries in the future.

Nonetheless, the opponents of this view assert that teaching other academic subjects should not be neglected, and it requires significant financial support, too. Thus, subjects, such as humanities or arts, play a vital role in the society because having specialists to preserve history and culture is crucial for any nation. On the other hand, studying such disciplines develops critical thinking, communication skills, or artistic talents that are needed for students who are unlikely to link their careers with science, but would rather choose to be musicians, writers or painters.

To summarize the above reasons, I would say that spending on teaching science should be a major educational budget item as we live in the era of rapid technological breakthroughs and incessant challenges posed by science. However, other academic subjects also require constant financial support because non-scientific spheres of life also need specialists.

10 sentences
286 words

5) Тема эссе:

Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.

Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

Пример эссе: