Альтернативный, разделительный, специальный, вопрос к

подлежащему.This basic utility-maximization analysis has been modified

and expanded in many different ways.

6. Выполните анализ данных предложений, обратив внимание на следующие грамматические явления: причастие, инфинитив, герундий и их обороты.

The optimizing behaviorof individual units such as households and firms

provides the foundation for microeconomics.

For example, it is used in industrial organization, labor economics,

international trade, cost-benefit analysis, and many other economic subfields.

The methodological distinction became somewhat blurredduring the 1970s

as more and more macroeconomic analyses were built upon microeconomic

foundations.

In order to maximizeutility the consumer purchases goodsso that the

subjective rate of substitution for eachpair of goods as indicated by the

consumer's utility function equals the objective rate of substitution given by

the ratio of their market prices.

Under pure competition,the producer is a price taker who may sell at the

going market price whatever has been produced.

7. Ответьте на вопросы по тексту:

1. What is, according to the text, microeconomics?

2. What is meant by “economics in the small”?

3. What economic phenomena are of microeconomists’ attention?

4. Where is microeconomic theory used?

5. What is “optimization”?

6. What is the concept of the theory of consumer?

7. What is the major difference between the theory of consumer and the theory of producer?

8. Where is microeconomic theory used?

9. What is the microeconomist interested in

10. What plays a key role in microeconomics?

Составьте аннотацию по тексту (2-3 предложения).

Составьте реферат текста (10-15 предложений).

Составьте план текста и перескажите текст.

ВАРИАНТ 18.

1. Прочитайте и переведите текст:

Text. Growth and Development of a Capitalism

The similarities in the patternsof growth and development of the different economies, are of interest. In every developed capitalist economy, as levels of per capita incomes rose, there was an absolute (and relative) decline in employment in agriculture and an absolute (and relative) increase in employment in the service or tertiary sector.Employment patterns in industry followed a different path.

From relatively low per capita incomes (for developed capitalist countries), relative and absolute employment in industry rose. After higher levels of per capita incomes were realized (those attained in most economies by the mid-1960s), employment in industry as a share of total employment began to drop off. In contrast, in absolute terms employment in industry rose continuously in the majority of the developed capitalist economies until the early 1970s, when stagnationset in.

A simple way of characterizing this process of growth and development in the postwar period is to envisagea situation of high rates of growth of productivity and low rates of growth of demand in agriculture interacting to release labor for industry and the service sector. The high rates of business investment mentionedearlier enabled the expanded labor force in the nonagricultural sectors to be equipped withthe most productive capital plant and equi pment available. This was especially so for those economies starting from relatively low levels of per capita incomes, since these economies were in a position to borrow the most advanced technologyfrom the high-income economies. Thus, an outstanding characteristic of the Japanese postwar modernization process was the widespread purchases of licenses from the United States of process technologies. These required modifications and adaptation to suit the Japanese needs, to be sure, but Japanese industrialists (and others) clearly were able to skipsome of the research and development stages involved in implementinga technology and thereby reduce costs of production. These industrialists were also in a better position to borrow and install only the best technologies available. As a result of these and other factors, the period from the early 1950s to the early 1970s saw a strong tendency for countries with relatively low levels of per capita income at the beginning of the period to grow relatively rapidly. For all the developed capitalist economies, the same period marked (in terms of its durationand pervasiveness)capitalism's greatest boomin history.

The period since the early 1970s has been termed a period of «stagflation» for capitalism, characterized by stagnation(slow growth, low investment, and high unemployment] together with inflation. Growth rates [and inflation rates] have continued to divergefrom one country to the next during the current period, but there has been a general scaling-down of the pace of growthand development in all the developed capitalist economies. The primary factor involved in the collapse of the worldwide postwar boom has been a fear of inflation engenderedby an acceleration in the rate of inflation beginning in the late 1960s and lasting into the mid-1970s. The response of governments to inflation in the majority of the capitalist economies has been to pursue anti-inflationary demand policies coupledat times with some form of incomes policy. This approach has led to higher rates of unemployment and lower rates of profits and utilizationof capital by business. The latter has definitely depressed business investment and has contributed to the decline in growth rates. Whether such recession-induced anti-inflationary policies will work eventually is still a matter of heated discussions among economists. If the policies do not work and if efforts by governments to restore prosperitythrough stimulate aggregate demand policies accelerate inflation rates, one of two

responses is government

likely. Either new forms of increased intervention will occur or the authorities Will choose to restrict aggregate demand and maintainhigh rates of unemployment on a long-run basis in order to contain inflation. In either case, an entirely new concept defining the essential features of capitalism will become appropriate.

2. Переведите на русский язык следующие английские словосочетания:

1. an absolute decline in employment;

2. tertiary sector;

3. a share of total employment;

4. to release labour for industry;

5. to envisage a situation;

6. the high-income economies;

7. the widespread purchases of licenses;

8. to diverge from one country to the next;

9. recession-induced anti-inflationary policies;

10. to restore prosperity.

3. Найдите в тексте английские эквиваленты следующих словосочетаний:

1. прогрессивная технология;

2. темп роста;

3. быть оборудованным чем-либо;

4. относительно низкий доход;

5. большинство развитых стран;

6. процесс роста и развития;

7. высокий коэффициент роста;

8. сократить стоимость производства;

9. уровень дохода на душу населения;

10. ускорение роста инфляции.

4. Найдите в тексте слова, имеющие общий корень с данными словами. Определите, к какой части речи они относятся, и переведите их на русский язык:similar;

1.similar;

2. to grow;

3. employ;

4. continue;

5. develop;

6. agriculture;

7. relate;

8. capital;

9. accelerate

10. to discuss

5. Задайте к предложению все типы вопросов: общий, альтернативный, разделительный, специальный, вопрос к подлежащему.These industrialists were also in a better position to borrow and install only the best technologies available.

6. Выполните анализ данных предложений, обратив внимание на следующие грамматические явления: причастие, инфинитив, герундий и их обороты.

1. In every developed capitalist economy, as levels of per capita incomes rose,

there was an absolute (and relative) decline in employment in agriculture

and an absolute (and relative) increase in employment in the service or

Tertiary sector.

2. In contrast, in absolute terms employment in industry rose continuously in

the majority of the developed capitalist economies until the early 1970s,

when stagnationset in.

3. These required modifications and adaptation to suit the Japanese needs, to be sure, but Japanese industrialists (and others) clearly were able to skipsome of the research and development stages involved in implementinga technology and thereby reduce costs of production.

4. The latter has definitely depressed business investment and has contributed to the decline in growth rates.

5. This approach has led to higher rates of unemployment and lower rates of profits and utilizationof capital by business.

7. Ответьте на вопросы по тексту:

1. What similarities could be observed in every developed capitalist economy?

2. What sector had a relative increase in employment?

3. What results had been achieved by the mid 60s?

4. When did, according to the text, stagnation set in?

5. What countries were successful in borrowing the advanced technologies and capital?

6. Why did Japanese industrialist skip some of the research and development stages?

7. What were the causes of stagnation in world developed economies?

8. What two responses can take place if the policies “don’t work”?

9. Where was there an absolute increase in employment?

10. When did a share of total employment begin to drop off?

Наши рекомендации