Источники на иностранных языках

1. Anderson Edward C. Esq. & Timothy S. Cole, Esq. The UDRP – A Model for Dispute Resolution in E-Commerce? - 6 J. Small & Emerging Bus. L. 235 (2002);

2. Barlow John Perry. A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace. 1996. http://homes.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html.

3. Bellia Patricia L., Paul Schiff Berman, David G. Post. Cyberlaw problems of policy and jurisprudence in the information age. 2003

4. Benkler Yochai. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom (2006). : http://www.benkler.org.

5. Berman Paul Schiff «Seeing Beyond the Limits of International Law» http://www.papers.ssrn.com/sol3

6. Bradley Curtis A.. Customary International Law, and the Continuing Relevance of Erie. 120 Harvard Law Review. 869, 891-92 (2007)

7. Carpenter Brian. Architectural Principles of the Internet. June 1996. http://www.ietf.org/u/ietchair/dicuss-criteria.htm

8. Carpenter Brian. Internet Engineering Task Force of The Internet Society, Architectural Principles of the Internet, RFC 1958, at 1 Brian Carpenter ed., 1996. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1958.txt

9. Clark David D. & Marjory S. Blumenthal, Rethinking the Design of the Internet: The End to End Arguments vs. the Brave New World. Stanford Program in Law, Sci. & Tech., The Policy Implications of End-to-End Conference Paper, 2000.: http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/e2e/papers/TPRC-Clark-Blumenthal.pdf.

10. 1David Paul A. The Beginnings and Prospective Ending of «End-to-End»: An Evolutionary Perspective on the Internet’s Architecture. Stanford Econ. Dept., Working Paper No. 01-012, 2001, http://wwwecon.stanford.edu/faculty/workp/swp01012.pdfPerrit H. The Internet is Changing International Law. Chicago-Kent Law Rev. Vol. 73. 1998.

11. Dibbell Julian. A Rape in Cyberspace: How an Evil Clown, A Haitian Trickster Spirit, Two Wizards, and a Cast of Dozens Turned a Database into a Society), публикация «38 Village Voice 36» (21 декабря 1993): http:// www.juliandibbell/com/

12. Eduardo Gelbstein, Ahmad Kamal Information Insecurity. A survival guide to the uncharted territories of cyber-threats and cyber-security. Published by the United Nations ICT Task Force and the United Nations Institute for Training and Research One United Nations Plaza. New York 2002.

13. French Government, Internet Architecture: The Stakes of the End to End Principle, June 6, 2005. http://www.netgouvernance.org/E2E.PDF. http://www.netgouvernance.org/E2E.PDF.

14. Froomkin Michael. Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA and the Constitution 50 Duke Law Journal, 17, (2000).

15. Froomkin Michael. ICANN’s “Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy” – Causes and (Partial) Cures. 67 Brook. L. Rev. 605 (2002)

16. Geist Michael. Fair.com?: An Examination of the Allegations of Systemic Unfairness in the ICANN UDRP , 27 Brook J. Int’l L. 903 (2002).

17. Helfer Laurence R. Whither the UDRP: Autonomous, Americanized, or Cosmopolitan? 12 Cardozo J. Int’l & Comp. L. 493, 496-504 (2004).

18. Hestermayer Holger P.. The Invalidity of ICANN’s UDRP Under National. 3 Minnesota Intell. Prop. Rev. 1 (2002) Glennon Michael J. Limits of Law, Prerogatives of Power: Interventionism After Kosovo (2001); Michael J. Glennon, How International Rules Die, 93 Geo. L.J. 939 (2005).

19. 19.Glennon Michael J., The UN Security Council in a Unipolar World, 44 Va. J. Int’l L. 91, 94-100 (2003);

20. 20.Goldsmith Jack L. & Eric A. Posner. The Limits of International Law 225-26 (2005)

21. Hathaway Oona A. & Ariel N. Lavinbuk, Rationalism and Revisionism in International Law. 119 Harvard Law Review. 1404 (2006)

22. Herman Susan N. Collapsing Spheres: Joint Terrorism Task Forces, Federalism, and the War on Terror, 41 Willamette L. Rev. 941 (2005)

23. ICANN Publishes Revision to Proposed ICM (.XXX) Registry Agreement for Public Comment. http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-05jan07.htm; http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/12/01/icann_kills_xxx/. Internet Governance Forum. http://www.intgovforume.org

24. Internet Activities Board, «The Internet Standards Process» - RFC 1310, RFC Editor, March 1992, www.iab.org

25. Isenberg David. The Rise of the Stupid Network. http://www.rageboy.com/stupidnet.html.

26. Jack Goldsmith and Tim Wu, Who Controls the Internet?: Illusions of a Borderless World. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. pp i-xii, 1-219. (2006).

27. Jerome H. Saltzer, David P. Reed & David D. Clark, End-to-End Arguments in System Design. 2 ACM Transactions on Computer Sys. 277 (1984): http://www.reed.com/Papers/EndtoEnd.html.

28. Kesan Jay P. & Andres A. Gallo. The Market for Private Dispute Resolution Services – An Empirical Re-Assessment of ICANN-UDRP Performance. 11 Michigan. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 285 (2005).

29. Kim G. von Arx & Gregory R. Hagen, Sovereign Domains: A Declaration of Independence of ccTLDs from Foreign Control, 9 Rich. J.L. & Tech. 4 (2002), http://www.law.richmond.edu/jolt/v9i1/article4.html.

30. Lemley Mark & Lawrence Lessig, The End of End-to-End: Preserving the Architecture of the Internet in the Broadband Era. 48 UCLA L. Rev. 925 (2001)

31. Lessig Lawrence. The Architecture of Innovation. 51 Duke L.J. 1783 (2002)

32. Lessig Lawrence. Code and other Laws of Cyberspace. http://www.archiv.orgcyber.law.harvard.edu/lessigbio

33. Lessing Lawrence. Reading the Constitution in Cyberspace. 1998: http://papers.ssrn.com;

34. Lessing Lawrence. Intellectual Property and Code. 1997: http://www.law.stanford.edu/publications

35. Marjory S. Blumenthal, End-To-End and Subsequent Paradigms. L. Rev. Mich. St. U. Det. C.L. 709, 717 (2002)

36. Mayer-Schenberger Viktor & Malte Ziewitz. Jefferson Rebuffed: The United States and the Future of Internet Governance. 8 Colum. Sci. & Tech. L. Rev. 188. (2007). The Columbia Science and Technology Law Review. http://www.stlr.org/html/volume8/schoenbergerintro.php

37. Memorandum of Understanding. http://www.icann.org/general/icann-mou-25nov98.htm;

38. Milton Mueller. ICANN and Internet Governance. Sorting Through the Debris of «Self-Regulation». 1 Info. 497 (1999)

39. Post David G. and David R. Johnson, «The Great Debate – Law in the Virtual World” (2006) 11 (2) First Monday: http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_2/post/index.html.

40. Post David G. and David R. Johnson, «Law and Borders – the Rise of Law in Cyberspace». 48 (1996). Stanford Law Review 1367.

41. Post David G. In Search of Jefferson's Moose: Notes on the State of Cyberspace. Oxford Univ. Press: http://www. [email protected]

42. Stallman Richard Matthew. Transcript of Richard Stallman at the 3nd international GPLv3 conference; 22nd June 2006:http://www. stallman.org.

43. Reidenberg Joel. «Technology and Internet Jurisdiction» (2005). 153 University of Pennsylvania Law Review.

44. Reidenberg Joel. Rules of the Road on Global Electronic Highways: Merging the Trade and Technical Paradigms, 6 Harvard J. Law & Tech. 287 (1993)

45. Reidenberg Joel. The Privacy Obstacle Course: Hurdling Barriers to Transnational Financial Services, 60 Fordham Law. Rev. S137 (1992): [email protected]

46. Reidenberg Joel. Online Services and Data Protection Law: Regulatory Responses: http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/.

47. Simonelis A. Concise Guide to the Major Internet Bodies. [email protected]

48. Sloss David. Do International Norms Influence State Behavior? 38 Geo. Wash. Int’l Law Review. 159 (2006)

49. Shulman Rita. Note, USA Patriot Act: Granting the U.S. Government the Unprecedented Power to Circumvent American Civil Liberties in the Name of National Security, 80 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 427, 427-28 (2003).

50. Shulman Rita. Note, USA Patriot Act: Granting the U.S. Government the Unprecedented Power to Circumvent American Civil Liberties in the Name of National Security, 80 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 427, 427-28 (2003).

51. Weinberg Jonathan. ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy. 50 Duke L.J. 187 (2000).

52. World summit on the Information Society Outcome Documents: Geneva 2003 – Tunis 2005: http://www.itu.int/wsis/outcome/booklet.pdf

53. World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS): http://www.itu.int/wsis/basic/about.html.

54. World Summit on the Information Society, http://www.itu.int/wsis/. http://www.intgovforum.org. www.itu.int/wsis

55. Ziewitz Malte &Viktor Mayer-Schönberger. Jefferson Rebuffed: The United States and the Future of Internet Governance. The Columbia Science and Technology Law Review. 8 Colum. 188 (2007).http://www.stlr.org/html/volume8/schoenbergerintro.php.

56. Zittrain Jonathan. The Generative Internet. 119 Harvard. Law. Rev. 1974, 2029-32 (2006). http://www.ntia.doc.gov

57. Zwart Melissa. Heionline.30 Melb.U.L. Review.1002.2006

58. Zwart Melissa.Fair Use? Fair Dealing? Monash University - Faculty of Law Monash University, 2009: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1069183

Интернет ресурсы

1. ИПС "Консультант Плюс" - http:/www.elvis.ru/consultant/

2. Организация Объединенных Наций – http://www.un.org/russian/

3. Каталог документов по международному праву – http://list.ru/catalog/l1415.html

4. www.mid.ru – официальный сайт Министерства иностранных дел РФ

5. www.gov.ru – сервер органов государственной власти РФ

6. http://www.isoc.org

7. http://www.isoc.org/isoc/mission/,http://info.nic., http://www.livinginternet.com/i/ii/cerf.htm

8. http://info.nic.

9. http://www.darpa.mil

10. http://www.dbj.rt.bw.schu.de/feacher/info/rfc/rfc.htm, http://www.fags.org/rfcs/rfc158.htm.

11. http://www.icann.org/general.