Women's Rights as a means of destroying men

Woman at all times tied to the house due to the physiological peculiarities of the female organism. But after thousands of years she finally managed to reset the printing homemakers and defend the rights of a full person. This happened for two main reasons: Technical and political-economic. The first gave women to work like men, and receive equal wages, and the second changed the attitude to the woman, and forced to accept it as equal to a man. The second reason he gave to the woman, Legislated rights and freedoms, the right to positions of leadership, free enterprise, freedom of choice of family, education, work, etc. But every coin has a flip side. Having so many rights and freedoms, the woman ceased to be a woman, as a matter of importance. Most importantly, we had lost the woman mother's status and homemakers. Now the woman has every right not to learn how to cook, clean the house, not to participate in the upbringing of children, to have abortions and abandon children, and don't be faithful to her husband, to get married many times, swearing, the trade body, and none of it she will not be convicted, and maybe even praise. What, then, do men? To love and forgive, or just avoid them. No one wondered why I got divorced and continued to increase the number of persons with nonconventional orientation. Yes, because who would want to live with a woman who cannot cook, does not want to get even with him, cares not for him, not for children, doesn't want to study, work, but requires attention, care, and money. But the saddest thing is that the woman suppresses masculine, and men start to die. Though there is a scientific hypothesis that men are genetically extinct, but by and large this impact not only the environment, nutrition, and more education and the lack of a healthy lifestyle.

America's Problems

Any Empire faced with the problem of the lack of competition, leading her to the pride and deafness, and selfishness, and why she has ceased to consider the opinions of others, and eventually the allies turned away from her. You may recall the grandeur of many Nations, but they are all gone. Today there are two empires, or rather one, but with two heads. Is the United Kingdom, and the United States. UK kept in the shade, but at her behest or with the consent of the United States in the world doing whatever I want. Evidence of this can be found, remembering how many times the UK and the US were the differences in international decisions of the UN, the attack on Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and informed. But the saddest thing for US can be not alienated allies, and the growing dissatisfaction inside the country. In the struggle with the Soviet Union, the United States has created an ideology, like Communist, and the Communist and democratic ideologies have one thing in common - both are utopian. Basic utopian idea of communism all things in common, and all equally (that is, it can not work, or work in a slipshod manner, and to receive and all). The main utopia of democracy is government of the people. Under capitalism, cannot be concept of democracy. That's the basis of capitalism is private business. The basis of private business is to maximize profit. Also under capitalism, the state fades into the background, because the entire economy rests on private capital. The result is the following situation: All politicians have to promise people gold mountains to come to power. But when they came to power they want to remain in power, must comply with the requirements of private business. That's the power of the people. This is a deception of ordinary people. And, the most important deception in a democracy, it is the power of the people. Under socialism, too, as if the power of the people. Why I think so. Yes, because people, it's the society of the country. And how good are separated in society? That's right, not uniformly. That is, the rich are always less than the middle class and the poor, and then the state to support the economy, is obliged to fulfill every whim of the business, not the poor. Why the US can't get affordable health care, housing. Yes, because the business is unprofitable. Business is profitable maximum profit, and it is possible at the maximum price. Therefore, in the United States, and in Russia, which took over all the US, and indeed everyone who submits to this ideology, drug prices, housing will be the highest, while the business, which benefits from the situation, will always support the price level, and even deliberately create a situation or conditions for maintaining the strap. That is, in this country, if beautiful all present will not condemn the mass killing of people, whether women, children, or just a civilian. They believe the government that blatantly lying not only to their people but to the whole world. I can recall only one Iraq, and Yugoslavia. You can wave a test tube, and all the permission of the Americans and the world received. You can kill with impunity people. The real problem borzosti the US is not the lack of competition, and the support the UK. Other countries: Germany, France, Italy, Japan, Latin America, India, or are dependent on the US and the UK, or not have their point of view, that is afraid to go against these two powers. It turns out that the UK like big brother or even the father bears the responsibility for killing people. That is why the world is going on chaos, which Russia alone can't stop. Russia urgently needs to invest in re-equipment of the fleet, the repair of ships and other strategic parts, and out of all kinds of agreements on non proliferation of nuclear weapons, the renunciation of nuclear tests, and conduct fire with the use of nuclear weapons, such as rocket launches to the black sea to the New Land polygons. And return armed with missiles such as the SS shot with the disarmament. Just need to remind the world about the power of our missiles, and make it clear that in case of aggression Russia would attack all the forces of not only the United States and all its allies. This should be known to all the citizens of these countries. For this to be done in the doctrine of the paragraph: If the attacking country, a member of the bloc countries, Russia strikes a blow for all countries in the bloc, regardless of the state of the armed forces of these countries. That is, if a tiny country within the NATO attacks, for example St. Petersburg his only rocket, in response Russia is attacking all countries of NATO. Perhaps then the West will come to their senses, and stop supplying weapons to countries where the authorities are promoting the hatred of the Russian, time will intervene and stop their smaller brethren, and cease to provoke, and will deal better with their problems. Even in Russia, where there is no scarcity in the land, there is no overpopulation and high demand, the business creates all conditions for maximum prices, and the state in Russia and in the United States is doing nothing, and not act to reduce prices, but on the contrary, will do everything for the business. For example, the state in Russia in the 90, beginning of 2000's as it is not deliberately increased the amount of dilapidated housing. How did this happen? It's very simple. Funds went not major repairs and construction of new housing, and who knows where. In the end housing, which could have lasted for another 30-50 years is now considered an emergency, and accordingly this factor creates a shortage of housing that is widely used by developers, inflating the price. In the United States also supported all sorts of measures in order to create the appearance of a housing shortage, and to keep prices at a high level. The next problem in the United States the influx of migrants. The government deliberately promoted the miracle of the conditions for a person to entice more people than were able to create competition in the labour market, and to create a surplus of labor. This measure allowed us companies to reduce the cost of goods and increase production, leading to economic growth, as well as increase the size of the army.

But the flip side of the coin in the end led to higher unemployment, and ideological machine to an influx of migrants. In fact, in Europe, as well as the influx of migrants can be explained not only by war, and most of the colonial policy of Europe, and its promotion of high social protection of the population in the region, high income unemployment and working population. And now the whole ideology of the countries of the West turned against them. Another problem the United States that will lead the world to the 3rd world war is to bet on winning at any cost is Russia. At the beginning of the struggle with the Soviet Union took away a lot of money on social spending( it was impossible to lose the Communist ideology in the workers ' rights, human), on weapons and science., then, after the collapse of the USSR it was necessary to consolidate the success, and spend a lot of money on the promotion of democracy, the increase of the army for the war with Russia, and the creation of the status of the Empire. All these enormous expenses led to the fact that the US is now the largest debtor in the world. But the U.S., instead of developing the economy and settlement with creditors is betting on getting a huge amount of money by not making, and robbery. They just take away from others. The goal, someone wants to Rob, by killing, is Russia. All the political, economic, ideological work in the United States and its ally great Britain aimed at the destruction of the country and people of Russia, and the seizure of territory of Russia. This problem of capture makes US a country of selfishness and fascism. Selfishness, because expanding the war against Russia the USA never thinks about their allies. It is obvious that in case of war Russia in response to the strike on those countries, which carried out the aggression. And this: Japan, Korea, the Baltic States, the countries of Western Europe. The United States under the guise of the ideology of democracy and human rights, thriving real fascism. How else to explain the calm attitude of the society towards a possible nuclear strike on other countries that don't even own weapons of mass destruction. In the United States are also not condemned by society, the attack of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Another problem of the United States is again, in their capitalism, when education is not available, and for this reason a growing number of gang youth, immigrants from poor countries for the fun of killing people. Not educated, not motivated to work, young people just create gangs, and the proliferation of weapons leads even to murder in schools. Instead of solving all these problems, the US government under the pretext of national security, protection of human rights (although in the country, these rights are violated and the government and the rich), the spread of democracy around the world, its a lot expensive by the way a war game, is sowing the so-called controlled chaos. The problem is that at any moment the chaos could become unmanageable. And then mopped all the Affairs of the United States is the whole world. This is already happening. Refugees from Syria and neighbouring countries flee to Europe, though all made the US and the UK. The same will happen with other US allies. When will world 3, this will affect primarily the US allies. And so all the people of these countries need to defend their right to their own opinion and life, not to be a plant. Maybe then the US and Britain will start to look for a diplomatic solution to the conflict, not armed. Although, knowing the lobby system in the U.S. business will not give peace to solve everything. This is a very profitable business, and people, when it comes to money, nothing is worth it. Turns out that in the most democratic country there is a mode. Here Snowden as a traitor. And the US betray their allies? And governments who support the US, not to betray their people? Snowden on the contrary defended the protection of the rights of ordinary people, but the US regime that do not care about people, immediately made him his representative. And the power mode is visible by how scared the media in the United States. Where is the vaunted American freedom of speech? Where is independent media? This is the true face of American democracy and the entire system. In the United States nothing. All the labors of generations of the American people in the 20th century went down the drain. That's what should worry US, not some sort of African peoples, which is the 100th anniversary lived without You, and would have lived the same. If the US does not dare to attack, which is unlikely, their mood, their marketing moves-money. Although there is no. The company's pharmaceutical and military industries brought their profits. Here is their price shows how much human life is worth nothing. Here the experiments on which someone was cashing in: Ebola was given the opportunity to earn billions by destroying as many people and diverting attention from the dirty political games of the USA. And how to explain its sudden appearance and disappearance? It's like all the possible flu, smallpox, anthrax a weapon of political games and manipulation of public consciousness. There are strains, there are vaccines, and all played according to the script. Or do you really believe that a modern laboratory can quickly defeat the virus? Remember to only about AIDS, cancer, flu. For some reason they can't win, and Ebola, and the plague was quickly neutralized.