The Information Professional facing the impact of Search Technology

By Hannah Verhoeff,

Anke Vellenga[12]

“Finding a needle in a haystack”, refers to the role of an Information Professional, but today it also points out the core function of the Search Technology.

In 2006, the amount of digital information created, aptured, and replicated was about 3 million times the information in all books ever written (Gantz, 2007). According to various researchers, the volume of digital information doubles every two to three years. The volume of information is growing with an incredible speed. Information surrounds us, is of great importance for our society and mission critical speaking in terms of business. There is no doubt of the significant role of the Information Professional (IP) in this information economy.

Why the Information Professional?

The growth of information is becoming the largest risk and challenge for the IP, CIO’s and analysts acknowledge. The information volume grows each year with 57 percent, which can cause a smothering feeling. We are living in a information society in which the IP has never been as important as now. Information is the basic resource in the work (Webster, 2002) and it connects us in this networking society linking people to each other (Webster, 2002). Information is the lifeblood of the knowledge-based organization and essential for innovation and continuing learning. The IP plays a distinctive role in gathering, organizing and managing information access to the best available information resources for the organization (Abel, 2003). The professional managing content collections and taking care of the information resources and services, is unambiguously the key figure in this information age.

Who is the information professional?

The information profession seems to be constantly trying to define a role for itself in 21st century organizations. Many experts in the world of information have argued about the focus IPs should have, especially within the framework of defining university’s curriculum because of a decreasing interest in the information related studies. Much that is written on this topic is strongly influences by the author and background of the ‘articles’. Scientific papers and writing on this topic are mostly on a specific role or position of the IP and a complete definition or an overview of the information profession is lacking. Some experts say the information profession is something that is subjected to the employment situation, some say it is specially liable to the influences of the Information Technology. Over the last few years, experts have been defining the role of the IP as a gathering of competencies, whether or not broken down in clusters. Obviously the profession is multifaceted and in most cases asks for clarification. Findings in a research taking place a few years ago point out that the IP would call itself experts in search and retrieval of information, interacting with the searcher and delivering tailor made information (Hendriks, 2003). The core competencies of the IP is making information resources accessible and organizing it. Next to that creating metadata, performing search and retrieval, and navigating the searchers to the right information (Van Dijk, 2003).

This reflects the background of the profession, lying in the world of the librarian. But the modern IP is experiencing more challenges by the influences and the increasing expectations of their environment. Particular circumstances have had influence on the information profession. Three aspects meddled in the environment of the profession:

1) ICT;

2) Individuality of information searchers;

3) Acknowledgement by the organization.

1) ICT: A practical example is the a large impact on the function of the library. ICT has made information accessible en changed the lifecycle of information (van de Pas, 2006). By increasing digital information becoming, libraries were finding themselves in a crush and because of that integrating the library with other information workspaces. The library and the traditional librarian see their work change rapidly.

2) The ‘user’ is becoming more individual by web search engines. Intervention by a professional helping the user to find the right information is often becoming superfluous. 3) Acknowledgement by the organization management. Not being noticeable and acknowledged in the business environment is something that is changing. The IP should not be separated by the management, but involved with taking business decisions. The importance of the IP has not always been recognized and IPs inside organization experience being underestimated when it comes to a contribution for the management. This seems to change since the awareness of the importance of information is growing. From this point we would like to distinguish four major competencies, which are extracted out of earlier studies. Because one must take into consideration that the widespread employability of the IP does not make it easy to define competencies (Boom, 2002), we have chosen to distinguish the major competencies: 1) managing information organizations; 2) Managing Information Services; 3) Applying Information Tools and Technologies 4) Managing Information Resources; (Abel, 2003). The last major competence we discuss more detailed because this is we consider ‘managing information resources’ to be most pressured by the ES Technology.