Summarized the assessment of the students in the discipline
| Score alphabetic system | Digital equivalent | Points | Score from the traditional system |
| А | 4,0 | fine | |
| А- | 3,67 | 90-94 | |
| В+ | 3,33 | 85-89 | good |
| В | 3,0 | 80-84 | |
| В- | 2,67 | 75-79 | |
| С+ | 2,33 | 70-74 | satisfactorily |
| С | 2,0 | 65-69 | |
| С- | 1,67 | 60-64 | |
| D+ | 1,33 | 55-59 | |
| D | 1,0 | 50-54 | |
| F | 0-49 | unsatisfactorily |
Criteria for evaluation of knowledge-based ГОСО РК 5.03.06-2006 «Система образования республики Казахстан. Контроль знаний в высших учебных заведениях» от 26.08.2006г.
1. Knowledge, skills and competencies of students in all types of control are determined by estimates point-lettered rating systems that have a proportional relationship.
2 Rated "excellent" corresponds to an A, which has the digital equivalent of 4.0, and the percentage of 95-100% and A-, which has the digital equivalent of 3.67 and percentage of 90-94%.
This assessment is put in when the student has shown an understanding of programming material and did not allow of any errors, inaccuracies, timely and properly completed tasks, showing the original thinking, on time and without errors homework, doing research work independently using additional scientific literature in the study of the discipline, he was able to organize their own program material.
3. "Good" is graded B +, which has the digital equivalent of 3.33 and percentage of 85-89%, Bwhich has the digital equivalent of 3.0, and the percentage of 80-84% and B-, which has the digital equivalent of 2.67 and percentage content of 75-79%
This assessment is put in when the student has mastered the program material is not lower than 75% and is not a gross error in the response, the timely implementation of the task and gave them no fundamental observations performed correctly and on time has passed without major homework comments use additional literature on teacher direction, engaged in research work, made mistakes or unprincipled principal issues that are fixed by the student, was able to organize the program material with the help of the teacher.
4. "Satisfactory" assessment corresponds to the estimate of C +, which has the digital equivalent of 2.33 and percentage of 70-74%, andC, which has the digital equivalent of 2.0, and the percentage of 65-69%, C-, which has the digital equivalent of 1.67 and percentage content of 60-64%, D +, which has the digital equivalent of 1.33 and percentage of 55-59%, and D, which has the digital equivalent of 1.0, and the percentage of 50-54%.
This assessment is put in when the student has mastered the program material is not less than 50%, the performance of tasks needed by the teacher, not been active in research, only limited academic literature, this teacher, had great difficulties in organizing the material.
5. Evaluation of "unsatisfactory" is graded F, which has the digital equivalent of 0, and the percentage of 0-49%.
This assessment is put in when the student found a gap in the knowledge base material under the program, more than half had not mastered the discipline of the program, the responses made fundamental errors, did not fulfill individual tasks contained in the form of current, intermediate and final control, has not completed all the basic literature provided by the program.
Machinery and equipment
Equipment: LCD projector, computers, educational-training class in obstetrics and gynecology, educational films.
Equipment: test items, test questions, case studies, copies of medical records.
2.10. Recommended Reading:
References:
1. Management of Perinatal Infections Edited by Dr Pamela Palasanthrian, Dr Mike Starr, and Dr Cheryl Jones.- Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases, 2002.-71p.
2. Dounald School Textbook of Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2011.-P.149-156, P.213-220.
3. Berek Руководство по акушерству и гинекологии: учебное пособие/ пер. с англ. Под ред.Э. Jonathan S. Berek &Novak’s Gynecology, 14th Edition Copyright ©2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.-P.4-25.P.66-72
4. Гинекология: учебник / под ред. Г.М.Савельевой, В.Г.Бреусенко. – 3-е изд. – М., 2008. – 432 с.
Further Reading
1. Чернуха Е. А. Родовой блок: Руководство для врачей.-М.:Триада-Х,2005
2. Айламазян Э.Г. Акушерство – учебник для студентов мед.ВУЗов. Санкт-Петербург. – 2005 г.
Наглядное акушерство и гинекология. Норвитц Эррол Р., Шордж Джон О., Пер.с англ-М: ГЭОТАР-МЕД,2003-144с.