Origin of russian institutes of financial controle

Pavel P. BARANOV

Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

[email protected]

Aleksandr A. SHAPOSHNIKOV

Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

[email protected]

JEL classification: М41, М42, N23

Abstract

Importance Main items of research in the present article are prerequisites of emergence, the creation purpose, and the content of activity and feature of functioning of domestic institutes of an audit and fiscal offices at the beginning of the 18th century.

Objectives The main objective of research is specification and systematization of standard and legal bases of auditor and fiscal offices in Russia of Peter the Great’s era, and detection of features and regularities of development of the specified institutes and historical search of sources of modern Russian audit of financial statements.

Methods Research is based on methodology of historical and comparative approach in the context of which historical and genetic, problem and chronological, historical and typological methods are applied.

Results As a result of research the structure, sequence of acceptance and the periods of commissioning of the legislative documents that have defined creation of the state institutes of an audit and fiscal offices in Russia at the beginning of the 18th century are specified. Organizational aspects and the valid content of activity of each of the specified services are characterized. Authors reveal the similarities and define distinctions in areas of jurisdiction, functional duties, ways and methods of realization of office functions by institutes of the Russian audit, fiscal offices and institute of modern domestic audit.

Conclusions and Relevance Conducted research has allowed to create set of the arguments for refusal of interpretation of a military auditor office of Peter’s times as predecessor of domestic audit of financial statements. On the contrary, it is proved that fiscal service of the beginning of the 18th century is the first institute of the Russian financial control within which formation of methodology and methodical methods of receiving and an assessment of the auditor evidence, which are widely used in modern auditor practice in the form of auditor procedures has begun.

Keywords: audit office, fiscal office, audit, legal acts, functional duties

References

1. Baranov P.P. Ugroza utraty institutsional’nogo statusa auditorskoi deyatel’nosti v usloviyakh stagnatsii teorii audita [Threat of loss of the institutional status of auditor activity in the conditions of stagnation of the theory of audit]. Sibirskaya finansovaya shkola = Siberian financial school, 2012, no. 6 (95), pp. 144-149.

2. The dozy watchdogs. The Economist, 13.12.2014.

3. Sheremet A.D., Suits V.P. Audit [Audit]: Uchebnik. – 2-e izd., dop. i pererab. – M.: INFRA-M, 2000. – 352 p.

4. Novikova T.Yu., Koroleva G.A. Audit: Razdel 1. Teoriya audita [Audit: Chapter 1. The theory of an audit]: uchebnoe posobie / T.Yu. Novikova, G.A. Koroleva; Yarosl. gos. un-t. – Yaroslavl’: YarGU, 2005. – 128 p.

5. Epifanov P.P. Voenno-ustavnoe tvorchestvo Petra Velikogo [Military and authorized creativity of Peter the Great] // Voennye ustavy Petra Velikogo [Military charters of Peter the Great] / Pod red. N. L. Rubinshteina. – M.: Izd-vo Gosudarstvennoi Biblioteki SSSR, 1946. – pp. 5-42.

6. Petr I. Tabel’ o rangakh vsekh chinov, voinskikh, statskikh i pridvornykh, kotorye v kotorom klasse chiny; i kotorye v odnom klasse, te imeyut po starshinstvu vremeni vstupleniya v chin mezhdu soboyu, odnako zh voinskie vyshe prochikh, khotya b i staree kto v tom klasse pozhalovan byl [The table of ranks of all ranks, military, state and court, which in which class ranks; and which in one class, those have on an effective date seniority in a rank between themselves, however military above other though and is older who in that class has been granted] // Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiiskoi imperii, s 1649 goda = Complete collection of laws of the Russian Empire, since 1649, – SPb.: Tipografiya II otdeleniya Sobstvennoi Ego Imperatorskogo Velichestva kantselyarii, 1830. – T. VI, 1720–1722, №3890. – pp. 486-493.

7. Akishin M.O. U istokov yuridicheskoi professii v Rossii: voennye auditory Petra Velikogo [At sources of a legal profession in Russia: military auditors of Peter the Great] // Leningradskii yuridicheskii zhurnal = Leningrad legal magazine, SPb. 2009. № 2 (16). pp. 117-131.

8. Rozengeim M.P. Ocherk istorii voenno-sudnykh uchrezhdenii v Rossii do konchiny Petra Velikogo [Sketch of history of military and judgment establishments in Russia before Peter the Great’s death]. SPb., 1878.

9. Pis’ma i bumagi Petra Velikogo [Letters and papers of Peter the Great], SPb., 1889. T.2. – 816 p.

10. Sutormin G.M. Voennaya prokuratura ot Petra Velikogo do Nikolaya II [Military prosecutor’s office from Peter the Great to Nicholas II] // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava = History of state and law, 2003. №1. pp. 51-55.

11. Shaposhnikov A.A. Pushkin i audit v Rossii [Pushkin and audit in Russia] // Auditorskie vedomosti = Auditor sheets. 2000. №6.

12. Grigor’ev O.V. General-auditory v sudebnoi sisteme Rossiiskoi Imperii XIX veka [General auditors in judicial system of the Russian Empire of the 19th century] // Uchenye zapiski Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Scientific notes of the Oryol state university, 2014. №2 (58). pp. 246-248.

13. Baranov P.P. «Kod Frensisa Piksli»: opyt istochnikovedeniya v issledovanii istorii audita [«Code of Francis Pixley»: expertise in source studies for audit history research] // Auditorskie vedomosti = Auditor sheets, 2015. №12. pp. 45-56.

14. Aminova E.M. Finansovyi kontrol’ v Rossii: istoriya i sovremennost’ [Financial control in Russia: history and modern time] // Pravo i upravlenie = Law and management. XXI century, 2011. №2 (19). pp. 48-55.

15. Serov D.O. Petr I kak sudebnyi deyatel’ [Peter I as judicial figure] // Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Istoriya, filologiya = Bulletin of NSU. Series: History, philology, 2007. T. 6. Vypusk 1: Istoriya. pp. 28-34.

16. Serov D.O. Sudebnaya reforma Petra I: Istoriko-pravovoe issledovanie [Judicial reform of Peter I: Historical and legal research]. Monografiya. M.: IKD «Zertsalo-M», 2009. – 488 p.

17. Pautov A.D. Institut fiskalov v otechestvennoi istoriografii [Institute of fiscals in a domestic historiography] // Aktual’nye problemy otechestvennoi istorii XVI – nachala XX vv. = Actual problems of national history in XVI – beginning of XX century: mezhvuz. sb. nauch. tr. Vyp.3. Omsk, 2006. pp. 46-56.

18. Chekurda E.A. K voprosu o proiskhozhdenii instituta fiskalata v Rossii [To a question of an origin of institute of a fiscals in Russia] // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Omsk university. Seriya «Pravo», 2014. №3 (40). pp. 40-45.

19. Shebaldina G.V. Zalozhniki Petra I i Karla XII. Povsednevnyi byt plennykh vo vremya Severnoi voiny [Peter I and Karl XII’s hostages. Daily life of prisoners during Northern war]. – M.: Lomonosov’’, 2014.

20. Katanaev G.E. Knyaz’ Matvei Petrovich Gagarin. General’nyi prezident Sibirskogo prikaza i sibirskikh provintsii sudiya. Moskovskii komendant i vseya Sibiri gubernator. (Pervyi sibirskii avtonomist) [Duke Matvei Petrovich Gagarin. General President of the Siberian order and Siberian provinces judge. Moscow commandant and all the Siberia governor. (First Siberian autonomist)]. – Tyumen’: Mandr i Ka, 2005.

21. Pautov A.D. K voprosu o deyatel’nosti ober-fiskala A.Ya. Nesterova [To the question of chief fiscal A.Ya. Nesterov’s activities] // Aktual’nye problemy otechestvennoi istorii XVI – nachala XX vv. = Actual problems of national history in XVI – beginning of XX century: mezhvuz. sb. nauch. tr. Vyp.2. Omsk, 2005. pp. 51-60.

22. Chernykh S.E. Nachalo polozhila krepost’ [The beginning comes from the fortress]. Sbornik statei, ocherkov / Upravlenie arkhivami Vostochno-Kazakhstanskoi oblasti, gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Vostochno-Kazakhstanskoi oblasti; Sost. L.P. Rifel’. Ust’-Kamenogorsk, 2004. – 67 p.

23. Bychkova S.M. Dokazatel’stva v audite [Evidence in auditing]. M.: Finansy i statistika, 1998.

Наши рекомендации